EMOTION DETECTIVE DOESN'T GET HER LOCO DELUSIONAL STALKER BATSHIT CRAZY ...
Published on Sep 28, 2017
A GREAT TWEET AND TOTALLY RELIABLY FACTUAL NO DOUBT.
"Narcissist @narcissist_me Sep 27
More
Replying to @Geneantonio2M
She is deluded and irrelevant"
SOME OTHER GREAT COMMENTS THAT ARE ALL TRUE.
"She never has proof of anything she claims. ED just makes stuff up and calls it the truth. You however, have had proof for everything you've said all along."
"It sure sounds to me like Peace Out on Narcsite is ED with a new fake name.
So that's what all her rape stuff is about, the discussion over there. Looks like others caught on. Same MO as ED... Have a baby fit when proven wrong."
"Hey Gene, can I make a request? I appreciate your videos to inform others of the crazy behaviors, though I think posting poor Lucy Lui naked pics is actually degrading to Lucy. Just my opinion as obviously ED is not Lucy. Also, that crazy head shot of the woman may be just a random artist. I'd focus on countering her mistruths about SN and Narcissists and "Aspergers". Most of the garbage she has been putting out lately is her obsession with HGs blog and his readers and her fantasy with HG. And occasionally smearing those women she hates. Honestly, no one on her twitter page retweets her stuff or likes it. The only attention she gets is here. I'd starve her ass of the attention at this point and make random updates countering her mistruths. That is how she is more dangerous is her mistruths. But, anyone with a brain can see she is bonkers. I mean google ED and all your numerous videos pop up along with her silly blogs. It's clear. She has reached a level of low grade entertainment for narcs and nonnarcs alike. Emphasis on low grade."
I AGREE. SHOWING THE PIC OF LUCY IS DEGRADING TO LUCY. LUCY IS HOT, SMART, SAVVY, SANE, DESIRABLE, SMART AND A SUCCESS. BUT LUCY IS ALSO A BIG GIRL, NO ABUSED VICTIM BEATEN UP DROWNED OR HELPLESS AND I THINK LUCY NEEDS TO KNOW ED OT STOLE AND USED HER PIC AS ED OT;S OWN PROFILE PIC TRYING TO BAIT HG TUDOR W/THE PHOTO. I THINK LUCY SHOULD SEE IT AND SUE THE HELL OUT OF ED OT. I ALSO THINK ED OT WILL DO IT TO OTHER WOMEN. ABOUT THAT LOCO LOOKING PIC, I'VE GOT SOME REASON TO BELIEVE THAT IS THE REAL ED OT. IF IT'S NOT I'LL MAKE SOME BIG ANNOUNCEMENTS. THEN THERE'S THE IDEA OF STARVING ED OT. I'VE DONE THAT AND WILL DO IT SOME MORE. DOESN'T MAKE MUCH DIFFERENCE EXCEPT ON ME WHEN I HAVE TO CATCH UP ON LIFE TIMES OF MORE AND MORE OF ED OT'S BULLSHIT ALL AT ONCE BECAUSE I'VE IGNORED IT FOR A WHILE. SAME THING W/NARCOPIG MARK SMITH. IF I WENT BACK TO EXPOSING HIS SHIT IT'D BE LIKE STARTING ALL OVER AGAIN BECAUSE THERE'S SO MUCH NEW LYING SCAMMING FRAUD AND CULT SHIT GOING ON W/NARCOPIG. IT'D BE A 2ND AND 3RD FULL TIME JOB 24/7 FOR ME TO PLAY CATCH UP. MEANING I MIGHT NOT DO IT.
"So, current tweets from ED is victim blaming. She states that "moral strength, steel integrity, high ethical standards, all prevent narcissistic abuse". So she blames the victim for being abused because if their "moral strength" was strong, they would not be abused. Insane! It is the narcissist that abuses and fools through gaslighting and targeting the victim vulnerability (a need to be loved usually). Her perspective is dangerous and blames the victim. #victimblaming #emotiondetective"
YUP THAT'S JUST WHAT ED OT IS DOING WHILST FACT IS WE ALL KNOW ED OT HAS NO MORALS, SHE'S PROVEN HERSELF TO BE A LIAR, SCAMMER, CLUELESS, IGNORANT, LOCO, DELUSIONAL, A STALKER ON AND OFF THE INTERNET, PSYCHOTIC, IRRELEVANT, A PATHOLOGICAL JEALOUSY DRIVEN FREAK AND LOTS MORE.
"Narcissist @narcissist_me Sep 27
More
Replying to @Geneantonio2M
She is deluded and irrelevant"
SOME OTHER GREAT COMMENTS THAT ARE ALL TRUE.
"She never has proof of anything she claims. ED just makes stuff up and calls it the truth. You however, have had proof for everything you've said all along."
"It sure sounds to me like Peace Out on Narcsite is ED with a new fake name.
So that's what all her rape stuff is about, the discussion over there. Looks like others caught on. Same MO as ED... Have a baby fit when proven wrong."
"Hey Gene, can I make a request? I appreciate your videos to inform others of the crazy behaviors, though I think posting poor Lucy Lui naked pics is actually degrading to Lucy. Just my opinion as obviously ED is not Lucy. Also, that crazy head shot of the woman may be just a random artist. I'd focus on countering her mistruths about SN and Narcissists and "Aspergers". Most of the garbage she has been putting out lately is her obsession with HGs blog and his readers and her fantasy with HG. And occasionally smearing those women she hates. Honestly, no one on her twitter page retweets her stuff or likes it. The only attention she gets is here. I'd starve her ass of the attention at this point and make random updates countering her mistruths. That is how she is more dangerous is her mistruths. But, anyone with a brain can see she is bonkers. I mean google ED and all your numerous videos pop up along with her silly blogs. It's clear. She has reached a level of low grade entertainment for narcs and nonnarcs alike. Emphasis on low grade."
I AGREE. SHOWING THE PIC OF LUCY IS DEGRADING TO LUCY. LUCY IS HOT, SMART, SAVVY, SANE, DESIRABLE, SMART AND A SUCCESS. BUT LUCY IS ALSO A BIG GIRL, NO ABUSED VICTIM BEATEN UP DROWNED OR HELPLESS AND I THINK LUCY NEEDS TO KNOW ED OT STOLE AND USED HER PIC AS ED OT;S OWN PROFILE PIC TRYING TO BAIT HG TUDOR W/THE PHOTO. I THINK LUCY SHOULD SEE IT AND SUE THE HELL OUT OF ED OT. I ALSO THINK ED OT WILL DO IT TO OTHER WOMEN. ABOUT THAT LOCO LOOKING PIC, I'VE GOT SOME REASON TO BELIEVE THAT IS THE REAL ED OT. IF IT'S NOT I'LL MAKE SOME BIG ANNOUNCEMENTS. THEN THERE'S THE IDEA OF STARVING ED OT. I'VE DONE THAT AND WILL DO IT SOME MORE. DOESN'T MAKE MUCH DIFFERENCE EXCEPT ON ME WHEN I HAVE TO CATCH UP ON LIFE TIMES OF MORE AND MORE OF ED OT'S BULLSHIT ALL AT ONCE BECAUSE I'VE IGNORED IT FOR A WHILE. SAME THING W/NARCOPIG MARK SMITH. IF I WENT BACK TO EXPOSING HIS SHIT IT'D BE LIKE STARTING ALL OVER AGAIN BECAUSE THERE'S SO MUCH NEW LYING SCAMMING FRAUD AND CULT SHIT GOING ON W/NARCOPIG. IT'D BE A 2ND AND 3RD FULL TIME JOB 24/7 FOR ME TO PLAY CATCH UP. MEANING I MIGHT NOT DO IT.
"So, current tweets from ED is victim blaming. She states that "moral strength, steel integrity, high ethical standards, all prevent narcissistic abuse". So she blames the victim for being abused because if their "moral strength" was strong, they would not be abused. Insane! It is the narcissist that abuses and fools through gaslighting and targeting the victim vulnerability (a need to be loved usually). Her perspective is dangerous and blames the victim. #victimblaming #emotiondetective"
YUP THAT'S JUST WHAT ED OT IS DOING WHILST FACT IS WE ALL KNOW ED OT HAS NO MORALS, SHE'S PROVEN HERSELF TO BE A LIAR, SCAMMER, CLUELESS, IGNORANT, LOCO, DELUSIONAL, A STALKER ON AND OFF THE INTERNET, PSYCHOTIC, IRRELEVANT, A PATHOLOGICAL JEALOUSY DRIVEN FREAK AND LOTS MORE.
COURT LINK: http://www.in.gov/apps/pla/litigation/pdfs.aspx?lic=34001845A
Mark Edward Smith
Address Information
Carmel IN 46032-5318
License Information
License No: 34001845A
Profession: Behavioral Health Board
License Type: Clinical Social Worker
Obtained By Method: Endorsement
Issue Date: 3/15/1993
Expiration Date: 4/1/2018
License Status: Active
Previous Action
Litigation Pending
Probation
Previous Action - YES
Violations
Violation: 25.1.9.4a.3 Description: Statute, Rule, or Regulation Violation
Date of Board Action: 12/22/2016 Sanction: Litigation Pending Cause Number: 2016BHSB0029
Related Licenses
No Prerequisite Information
The following PDFs were found for the license number 34001845A.
Date Type
04/02/2008 Complaint 71k
06/23/2008 Findings of Fact and Order 115k
06/26/2008 Findings of Fact and Order 115k
12/11/2008 Motions 156k
02/03/2009 Findings of Fact and Order 64k
12/22/2016 Complaint 267k
SAME DOCS AS BEFORE. THE CASE LOOKS TO STILL BE PENDING.
FIRST LINK. http://www.in.gov/pla/3119.htm
SECOND LINK. http://www.in.gov/apps/pla/litigation/pdfs.aspx?lic=34001845A
AND IF THEY LET NARCOPIG OFF THE HOOK FOR WHAT HE'S CLEARLY GUILTY OF THAT STILL DOESN'T MAKE HIM INNOCENT CUZ THERE'S LOTS OF PROOF HE DID A LOT OF NARC BORDERLINE CHEATING SEX ABUSING SCAMMING AND FINANCIAL FRAUD BULLSHIT FOR A LONG ASS TIME.
BEFORE THE BEHAVIORAL HEALTHAND HUMAN SERVICES BOARD
CAUSE NUMBER: 2016 BHSB QCQ^
IN THE MATTER OF THE LICENSE OF
MARK E. SMITH, LCSW
LICENSE NUMBER; 34001845A (Active)
)DEC 2 2 2016
Indiana Professional
Licensing Agency
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT
The State of Indiana ("State"), by counsel. Deputy Attorney General N. Renee Gallagher,
on behalf of the Office of the Indiana Attorney General, and pursuant to Ind. Code §25-1 -7-7, Ind.
Code ch. 25-1-5, Ind. Code § 25-23.6-2-7, the Administrative Orders and Procedures Act, Ind,
Code ch. 4-21.5-3 and Ind. Code ch, 25-1-9, files its Complaint against the Social Worker license
of Mark E. Smith ("Respondenf), and in support, states the following:
FACTS
1. Respondent's address on file with the Indiana Professional Licensing Agency isl4164
Camden Lane, Carmel, Indiana 46074,
2. On June 25, 2015, Respondent is a Clinical Social Worker license ("LCSW") in
Indiana, under license number 34001845A and is currently active.
3. Respondent was employed at Family Tree Counseling Associates ("Family Tree")
located at 11350 Meridian Street, Indianapolis, Indiana where Respondent was the Director from
approximately 1989 to present except for a leave of absence from work from approximately May
22, 2015 through July 23, 2015 while he was enrolled in in-patient treatment. In his absence,
Andrew Holzman acted as Interim Director for Family Tree.
4. Respondent's leave of absence from Family Tree was precipitated by several events. In the letter and consumer complaint, the LCSWs provided that a former client of Family Tree notified the LCSWs that the client had received an email from Respondent asking for the client to file a complaint against the co-worker of Respondent's fiance. In the email, many
details and allegations are made against the co-worker, such as referring to the co-worker as a "sex
addict," and details of the affair.
receipt of the email could possibly cause a "re-traumatizing" of someone who had been in an
affair, was sex addict, or who was in a relationship affected by similar behaviors. On July 29, 2015, the OAG received a second consumer complaint from a former client of Respondent who alleged that, while in marriage counseling as a couple with Respondent,
On or about April 26, 2015, Respondent learned that his fiance of approximately six or seven years was engaged in a sexual relationship with a co-worker.
6. Respondent continued to practice from April 26,2015 until approximately May 22,
2015.
On June 1, 2015, Respondent sent an email to approximately 600 or more clients
and business associates of Family Tree contained in the business' database asking that each
recipient send a written complaint to the employer of his fiance's and demand that the co-worker
be fired due to the affair Respondent learned about between Respondent's fianc6 and her co-
worker.
8. On June 15, 2015, the Office of the Indiana Attorney General ("OAG") and later
on August 6, 2015, a consumer complaint from two former Licensed Clinical Social Workers
("LCSWs") of Family Tree.
10.The LCSWs reported this information to the OAG as an alleged acts of
unprofessional behavior, a "blatant" abuse of client information and both were concerned that
11.Respondent hired his wife to work at Family Tree while the couple was continuing to receive
marriage counseling from Respondent.
12. In response to the two consumer complaints, dated August 18,2015 and September
6, 2015, Respondent admits to sending the June 1, 2015 email to over 600 clients, former clients
and business contacts and admits to hiring his Ms. Hall, his former client.
13. In his responses to the consumer complaints, Respondent also admits that he was
not fit to practice after learning of his fiance's affair in April 2015 however. Respondent continued
to practice until May 22, 2015.
14. Respondent, in his September 6, 2015 response, also provides that Ms. Hall is not
licensed but is an "unlicensed" intern who charges thirty (30) dollars per session and is supervised
by Respondent and another practitioner in his office, Mr. Holzman, the interim director at Family
Tree.
15. A review of licensing records at the Indiana Professional Licensing Agency for the
individuals listed as providing counseling services in Respondent's office reveals that at least four
do not have an active Indiana license to provide counseling services as a licensed social worker,
licensed mental health counselor or other license issued by the Board.
COUNT I
14. Paragraphs one (1) through fifteen (15) are incorporated by reference herein.
15. Respondent's conduct as described above constitutes a violation of Ind. Code
§25-l-9-4(a)(3) in that Respondent violated state statute or rule regulating the profession, in that.
Respondent failed to comply with 839 lAC l-3-4(b), as Respondent failed to act within the
generally accepted ethical principles and guidelines of the profession, when he engaged in a dual
relationship with a client by soliciting and then hiring the client into his practice during the
period of time Respondent was providing marriage counseling to the client/employee and her
spouse.
COUNT II
Paragraphs one (1) through fifteen (15) are incorporated by reference herein.
16.
17. Respondent's conduct as described above constitutes a violation of Ind. Code
§25-l-9-4(a)(3) in that, Respondent violated a state statute or rule regulating the profession, in
that. Respondent failed to comply with 839 lAC l-3-4(b)(6), as Respondent failed to act within
the generally accepted ethical principles and guidelines of the profession and the National
Association of Social Workers Code of Ethics and Ethical Responsibilities ("NASW") 1.06,
when he sent an email to approximately 600 or more email addresses of former and current
clients of his practice as well as business associates for his personal gain by requesting that the
recipients of the email file complaints against the co-worker who had an affair with
Respondent's fiance and referencing the affair and sexual addiction in the email.
COUNT III
18. Paragraphs one (1) through fifteen (15) are incorporated by reference herein.
19. Respondent's conduct as described above constitutes a violation of Ind. Code
§25-l-9-4(a)(3), in that, he violated 839 lAC l-3-4(b) and NASW 3.01 and NASW 5.01, when
Respondent employing and/or supervising persons who did not possess active licenses issued by
the Board to provide counseling services in Indiana.
COUNT IV
20. Paragraphs one (1) through fifteen (15) are incorporated by reference herein.
21. Respondent's conduct as described above constitutes a violation of Ind. Code
GREGORY F. ZGELLER
Attorney ^eneialM Indiana
ibW: 1 ?58-98
N. Rehee ^
Deputy y^ft^ei^General
Attorney
§25-l-9-4(a)(13), in that, Respondent assisted several persons in committing acts of practicing
without valid Indiana licenses which would be grounds for disciplinary action by the Board.
COUNT V
22. Paragraphs one (1) through fifteen (15) are incorporated by reference herein.
23. Respondent's conduct as described above constitutes a violation of Ind. Code
§25-l-9-4(a)(4)(B), in that. Respondent failed to keep abreast of current theory and professional
practice when he continued to work, although Respondent was unfit to work, and provide
counseling services during the period of April 26, 2015 through May 22, 2015.
WHEREFORE, Petitioner demands an order against the Respondent, that:
1. Imposes the appropriate disciplinary sanction;
2. Directs Respondent to immediately pay all of the cost incurred in the
prosecution of this case;
3. Directs Respondent to pay a fee of Five Dollars ($5.00) to be deposited into the
Health Records and Personal Identifying Information Protection Trust Fund
pursuant to Ind. Code § 4-6-14-10(b); and
4. Provide any other relief the Board deems just and proper.
Respectfully submitted.
Show less